PDF Version
         
        Basil  of Caesarea is accurately called, St. Basil the 'Great,' which is  a misnomer. Basil of Caesarea (330-375 AD) and  Athanasius of Alexandra ( St. Athanasius the 'Great,' (298-373 AD)) were, by  judging their fruit,  "...false  apostles, deceitful workers, transfiguring themselves into apostles of Christ"  (2 Cor. 11:13). Athanasius  is known for his work in forming the second god, 'God the Son,' while Basil is  known for his work in forming the third god, 'God the Holy Spirit.' Second Corinthians  chapter eleven was written with the purpose of warning us of such individuals  as these; ministers of the adversary, working from within the Church rather  than from without. They were the Pharisees of their day, similar to the  Pharisees who Yahoshua identified, in John chapter eight, by saying, "Ye,  are doing the works of your father. They said unto him...One father, have we—Yahweh...[Yahoshua  said] Ye, are, of your father—the adversary [slanderer], and, the covetings of  your father, ye choose to be doing. He, was, a murderer, from the beginning,  and, in the truth, he stood not; because truth is not in him: Whensoever he  speaketh falsehood, of his own, he speaketh; because, false, he is, and, the  father of it" (Jn. 8:41-44).  Sad to say, Athanasius and Basil are known, not only as the 'Church Fathers,' but  they are also called, the 'Doctors of the Church;' the blind leading the blind  and they both fell into the ditch. They rejected the Son of Yahweh, as the Pharisees  did, when they rejected the Word written concerning him, thereby rejecting  Yahweh.  
        You  might say, "Your statements are very judgmental," but Yahweh even  goes further and states, through Christ, through Paul, "I marvel that,  thus quickly, ye are moving away from him that called you in the favour of  Christ, unto a different glad-message,—Which is not, another, only there  are, some, that are troubling you, and wishing to change the glad-message  of the Christ. But, even if, we, or, a messenger out of heaven, announce a  glad-message aside from that which we announced unto you, accursed, let him  be! As we have said before, even now, again, I say: If anyone is announcing  unto you a glad-message aside from that which ye accepted, accursed, let him  be" (Gal. 1:6-9)! Athanasius and Basil knew this passage of scripture.  They created a different glad-message, the consequence of their actions being  that they are, 'accursed,' as are all people who proclaim a different  glad-message, than that which has been given, in the Hebrew and Greek text. 
        Athanasius, creator of, 'Another Jesus' 
          Athanasius,  along with many others, created, 'another Jesus.' This Jesus, as quoted from  the Nicene Creed of 325, is "...God  of God, Light of Light, very God of very God, begotten, not made, being of one substance with the Father. By whom all things were made, both which be in heaven and in earth.  Who for us men and for our salvation came down [from heaven] and was incarnate and was made man...And whosoever shall say that there was a  time when the Son of God was not, or that before he was begotten he was not, or  that he was made of things that were not, or that he is of a different  substance or essence [from the Father] or that he is a creature, or subject to  change or conversion--all that so say, the Catholic and Apostolic Church  anathematizes them." The words in italics are words that are not part  of the Word of Yahweh, making these statements the building blocks for, 'another  Jesus.' It is sad to say that these doctrines were established by Bishops  voting on them, the majority of votes determine what is truth and what is a lie.  Emperor Constantine called together, approximately, 200 Bishops, at the Council  of Nicaea, to establish Church doctrine. I wonder what doctrine we would have  today if Moses or Peter would have called a council of elders to vote on what  is orthodox and what is false? Once one leaves the parameter of the Word of  Yahweh, anything can become orthodox, including homosexuality, which has  occurred today with some Church Councils who have voted it into their creeds. 
        One  of the foundations of the Word of Yahweh is the coming of the 'seed of the  woman,' who would crush the dead of the serpent, who would tell good tidings to  the oppressed, bind up the broken-hearted, proclaim to captives, liberty, to  them who are bound, the opening of the prison, freeing us from being enslaved,  which was the result of the sin of our parents, Adam and Eve (Is. 61:1-2). Athanasius'  Jesus is not the 'seed of the woman,' because his Jesus has always existed. Athanasius'  Jesus is not the bridge, over which we cross, crossing an impossible chasm that  brings us to the Father. He is not the tunnel through the mountain, that we  were unable to climb, which allows us to fellowship with our Creator. Athanasius'  Jesus is not a man who is our mediator to our Father, such as is a prophet,  priest and advocate but rather he is the Creator of all things. The Word of  Yahweh declares otherwise.
        Yahoshua  was a prophet, as was prophesied in Deuteronomy 18:18-19; "A prophet, will I raise up unto them, out of the midst  of their brethren, like unto thee,—and I will put my words in his mouth, so  shall he speak unto them whatsoever I shall command him. And it shall come to  pass, that, the man who will not hearken unto my words, which he shall speak in  my name, I, myself, will require it of him." A prophet is a spokesmen for  Yahweh and not Yahweh speaking for Yahweh. 
        Yahoshua  is a begotten (yalad) son as proclaimed in Psalm 2:6-7; "Yet, I, have  installed my king,—on Zion  my holy mountain. Let me tell of a  decree,—Yahweh, hath said unto me, My son, thou art, I, today, have begotten  thee," but rather Athanasius states, "And whosoever shall say that  there was a time when the Son of God was not, or that before he was begotten he  was not, or that he was made of things that were not..." etc. The phrase  that is popular today is, 'eternally begotten,' which means he was never  begotten, which is a contradiction in itself. 
        Yahoshua  is a priest of the Most High El, as was Melchizedek as stated in Psalm 110:1,  4; "The declaration of Yahweh to my Lord—Sit thou at my right hand, Until  I make thy foes thy footstool...Yahweh, hath sworn—and will not repent, Thou,  shalt be a priest unto times age-abiding, after the manner of Melchizedek,"  but rather Athanasius states, he is "God of God, Light of Light, very God  of very God," and not a priest to himself.
        Yahoshua  is the son of Abraham, Jesse and David as the scriptures proclaim; "But  there shall come forth a shoot from the stock of Jesse,—And, a sprout, from his  roots, shall bear fruit...And he will smite the land with the sceptre of his  mouth, And, with the breath of his lips, will he slay the lawless one"  (Is. 11:1, 4) but Athanasius states he is not he son of anyone, including  Yahweh, because he states, "And whosoever shall say that there was a time  when the Son of God was not." If you have always existed, you can never be  a son!
        Yahoshua  is a man, who is the mediator between Yahweh and men; "For there is, one, Elohim,  one, mediator also, between Yahweh and men,—a man—Christ Yahoshua" (1 Tim.  2:5). Mediator is the Greek word, mesites (mes-ee’-tace), which means,  "one who intervenes between two, either  in order to make or restore peace and friendship, or form a compact, or for  ratifying a covenant." Galatians 3:20  states, "Now, a mediator, is not a mediator of one, but, Yahweh, is, one."  Mesites is derived from mesos, which means, middle. Athanasius's, 'God the  Son,' is not a man neither could he ever be a mediator because he being God,  could not be a mediator of one.   
        Athanasius  and his companions had more votes than their counterpart, so his new Jesus came  to be part of the Church doctrine, breaking Yahweh's first and second  commandments. Rather than Yahoshua sitting at the right hand of Yahweh, his  Father, he now sits in the same throne as his Father because he is his Father,  in some mystical way. Images of God the Son now appear in every church breaking  the second commandment. Now Christian churches can be as the pagans who can see  their gods.  
        Basil, creator of, 'a different spirit' 
          Basil  can take credit for the creation of a new doctrine, concerning the, 'Holy Spirit.'  Concerning the Holy Spirit, the Roman Creed (200 AD), begins by stating,  "I believe in God the Father almighty; and in Christ Jesus His only Son,  our Lord...and in the Holy Spirit,the holy Church, etc." One hundred years later, the Nicene Creed (325  AD) states, "...And [we believe] in  the Holy Spirit." Then came Basil's treatise, 'On the Holy Spirit,' written  around 363-364 AD, which contributed to the revison of, 'we believe in the Holy  Spirit,' into, "We believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver of  life, who proceeds from the Father and the Son. With the Father and the Son he  is worshiped and glorified. He has spoken through the Prophets." This  addition to the Nicene Creed appears in the Constantinople Creed (381 AD). 'A  different spirit,' has now taken form. "Although one will never read that  'the Holy Spirit is God' in Basil's treatise, one will find numerous statements  that 'the Holy Spirit partakes of the fullness of divinity.'" (See  Appendix A)
         Dia (through) Yahoshua Christ 
          One  of the outcomes of the above doctrines is the removal of the foundational  teaching, which is throughout the Word of Yahweh, that all must come to the  Father, 'through,' (dia) his only-begotten Son. (See Appendix B) Basil removed  the phrase, 'through the Son,' and replaced it with a new doxology (short hymn  of praise), by stating, "Glory to the Father with the Son together with  the Holy Spirit."    
        Basil  based his creation on one verse of scripture, Matthew 28:19, which states,  "Go ye, therefore, and disciple all the nations, Immersing them into the  name of the Father, and of the Son, and  of the Holy Spirit." Roman Catholics perform the sign of the cross by  saying, "In the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit,"  which is also not to be found in the Word of Yahweh. This phraseology is never  used by Moses, David, Solomon, Isaiah, Jeremiah, the minor prophets, Peter,  Paul, John or any other scribe but is only found in Matthew, in this one verse.  People were never immersed in this phraseology in the book of Acts but rather  they were immersed in the name of the Lord Yahoshua. Paul does not begin his  epistles by stating, "Favour unto you, and peace, from the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy  Spirit, but rather "Favour unto you, and peace, from God our Father,  and Lord Jesus Christ. Peter does not say, "Favour unto you, and peace, be  multiplied, in the personal knowledge of the  Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit," but rather, "Favour  unto you, and peace, be multiplied, in the personal knowledge of God and of  Jesus our Lord" (2 Pe. 1:2). Paul did not address the men at Athens by  saying the Constantinople Creed (Greetings from the Father, Son and Holy  Spirit) but rather, "The God that made the world and all things...is  charging all men everywhere to repent, inasmuch as he hath appointed a day, in  which he is about to be judging the habitable earth in righteousness, by a  man whom he hath pointed out,—offering faith unto all, by raising him from  among the dead" (Acts 17:24, 30-31)?  The phrase used in Matthew 28:19 does not agree  with the rest of the Word of Yahweh but stands to contradict what occurred shortly  thereafter and what was written. This one scripture must be set aside when it  contradicts hundreds of clear verses that state, "...There is one Elohim  the Father, of whom are all things, and, we, for him; and one Lord Yahoshua  Christ, through whom are all things, and, we, through him" (1 Cor. 8:6).  Yahoshua's Father is our Father and his God is our God (Jn. 20:17, Eph. 1:3, 17; 2 Cor. 1:3  etc.).
        Basil,  in paragraph 71 of his book, states, "The objection is that there is no  written authority for the doxology in the form, 'with the Spirit,' but this  is valid only if no other unwritten traditions can be found. However, if  many of our mysteries have been handed down from unwritten sources, the  let us receive this one with all the rest. It is in the apostolic spirit to  follow unwritten traditions, as St.    Paul says: "I comment you because you remember me  in everything and maintain the traditions even as I have delivered them to  you," or "stand firm and hold to the traditions which you were taught  by us either by word of mouth or by letter." Basil contradicts Paul, when  he proclaimed in Gal. 1:8, "But, even if, we, or, a messenger out of  heaven, announce a glad-message aside from that which we announced unto you, accursed,  let him be!" Basil's message is a different glad-message.
        Traditions of the Father 
          Basil's  statement concerning the unwritten or written traditions of the fathers unveils  the source of the majority of all false doctrines present in the Christian Church.  Once one leaves the parameter of the Word of Yahweh, all things become  possible. The Jews before Yahoshua's birth made the same mistakes, which  Yahoshua pointed out by stating, "And he was saying to them—Well, do ye  set aside the commandment of Yahweh, that, your own tradition, ye may observe"  (Mk. 7:9). Basil's and Athanasius' doctrines are not present in the Word of  Yahweh but they are present in the traditions of men. 
        Conclusion 
          Paul,  in 2 Corinthians 11, feared that the Corinthians minds might have been  corrupted, through the false teachings concerning 'another Jesus,' a 'different  spirit' and a 'different glad message,' taught by false apostles, deceitful  workers, who had transfigured themselves into apostles of Christ (2 Cor. 11:13). These pseudo apostles, who  were Hebrews, Israelites, of the seed of Abraham were called the adversary's  ministers who had transfigured themselves into ministers of righteousness. Are  these same ministers present today? Absolutely! You know a tree by it's fruit.  Athanasius and Basil fit the above description. Their teachings have corrupted  the minds of many, leading them away from the first and second commandments,  which state, "I, am Yahweh thy God...Thou shalt not have other gods,  besides me and Thou shalt not make to thee an image (there are many images of  God the Son and God the Holy Spirit, etc.)..." (Ex. 20:2-4). The religious  community call them Athanasius the Great and Basil the Great but according to  the Word of Yahweh, they are deceitful workers, who have been accursed (Gal.  1:6-9). 
        (When quoting scriptures, from the Rotherham  Emphasized Bible New Testament, I will substitute the Hebrew words 
          Yahoshua (yeh-ho-shoo’-  ah) for Jesus, Yahweh and Elohim  for God and the LORD and ruah for pneuma (spirit).)
        (For footnotes and Appendix, see PDF version)